1. Most students did not include total kVA requirements and had limited discussions about emergency power requirements.
2. Most students attempted the extra credit section
3. For many teams, more detail was needed on vehicular circulation, exits and entrances.
4. Many assumptions were left unjustified – when code-specified minimum requirements are used, the justification would be that the client did not want to adjust these criteria or have special requirements of their building.
5. Most teams uploaded the building program spreadsheet and presented information that was relevant to their successors.
6. Some teams took the initiative to create a rough layout showing adjacencies, even though this was not an explicit requirement. However, some teams did not include the adjacency at all.
7. A few teams did not prioritize integration goals and/or quanitify them.
8. Most teams forgot about the electrical program in the integration section.
No comments:
Post a Comment